I suppose we can do a journal entry type response here. That is
fitting considering my own opinions regarding Isabel.
In the first half of Portrait of a Lady, Isabel’s personality dominates the other
characters. She obsesses over independence. Her obsession grows to the point
that it is prompting other characters to do exactly what she herself fears to
do: operate under someone else’s command. The men each desire her, but she
desires for them to leave her alone—to cease their affection. Yet why should the
men themselves not be independent and choose to love her?
Isabel’s belief grows into a problem only because of the principle behind
it. She wants to remain independent. Initially, it is an acceptable belief. She wants
to see the world and learn new things for herself. That independence can be
admired and, to her credit, she attempts to retain that goal throughout,
refusing Lord Warburton for greater knowledge that comes from independence.
Unfortunately, the principle comes to control Isabel herself and she cannot
escape her own rules. As Isabel frets over Mr. Touchett’s death, she cannot
clearly decide whether she should accept the inherited money. Even earlier than his
death, she explains that she wants to live untied to anyone and have a candid
if not adventurous life (133-134).
In the same scene, Isabel reveals that she does not
logically know her actions. The end becomes to remain free of the influence of
others and not to best achieve the dream she has of seeing the world. I fear
that her character will become childlike, refusing only because others desire,
and placing her in a situation in which others control her by reverse
psychology despite all her beliefs that she is independent. The rest of the
novel should reveal her outcome, but at the moment, I believe she remains independent only to the extent that she operates opposite of others’ wishes—but
never strictly on her own.
No comments:
Post a Comment